Then, after the research, members had been requested what they had been doing, whether or not their thoughts was wandering, and the character of the topic they had been serious about. Had their minds wandered to a “nice” topic, a “impartial” one, or an “disagreeable” one?
The researchers discovered that about half the time, individuals’s minds wandered to a nice subject. In these cases, the research members described themselves as being no happier or much less comfortable than once they weren’t experiencing thoughts wandering.
In different phrases, an individual having a nice daydream isn’t necessarily a happier person.
In the meantime, the opposite half of the time (on common), research members described their minds as wandering to a impartial or disagreeable topic. In both case, these individuals had been sad.
“In conclusion,” the researchers wrote, “a human thoughts is a wandering thoughts, and a wandering thoughts is an sad thoughts. The flexibility to consider what is just not taking place is a cognitive achievement that comes at an emotional price.”
