Whereas the Depart It fallacy will be seen as a sort of Advert Hominem as a result of it includes rejecting an individual’s declare primarily based on an irrelevant assault on the individual, it has two distinguishing options.
First, the individual is attacked as a result of they’re being important of one thing. This assault typically includes asserting the critic is motivated by a secret affiliation or settlement with a disliked group. Second, reasonably than refuting the criticism, the attacker solely tells the goal to “depart.” There’s, nevertheless, the implied conclusion that the individual advised to depart is thus flawed of their criticism. The fallacy has the next common type:
Premise 1. Particular person A makes important declare X about Y.
Premise 2. Particular person B assaults A (normally for an alleged affiliation/settlement with a disliked group G) and says that if A doesn’t like X about Y, then they need to depart Y (normally for G).
Conclusion: Due to this fact, X is fake.
This argument is a fallacy as a result of attacking an individual and telling them to depart doesn’t show their criticism is fake. The fallacy attracts a lot of its psychological energy from the cognitive bias of groupthink and ingroup bias. Groupthink is the tendency to attempt to decrease battle and type a consensus by suppressing dissent and avoiding outdoors influences. Ingroup bias is the tendency to see one’s personal group as superior and outsiders as inferior. Somebody who’s important of a bunch can simply be offered as a menace and folks in that group will be motivated to reject that criticism out of anger and dislike. These biases don’t, in fact, have any logical weight.
Care ought to be taken to not confuse the Depart It fallacy with the False Dilemma “find it irresistible or depart it.” The thought on this False Dilemma is that one has simply two choices: to like one thing (sometimes a rustic) completely and by no means criticize it or depart it. There are clearly many different choices. The distinction between the 2 is that the Depart It fallacy includes utilizing an assault on the individual to “argue” that their criticism is fake whereas the False Dilemma “find it irresistible or depart it” is meant to silence criticism by wrongly asserting that one has solely the 2 decisions. It could actually typically be onerous to tell apart the 2 as a result of folks typically mix them and people trying these fallacies typically have no idea what they’re doing themselves.
Protection: The protection towards this fallacy is to attempt to purpose by any destructive emotions one may need and ask if any related refutation of the criticism has been supplied. If it has not, then the “argument” provides no purpose to reject that criticism. This doesn’t imply that the criticism is due to this fact true—it simply means the fallacy doesn’t present any purpose to reject it.
Instance #1
“These woke liberals declare that America nonetheless has systematic racism. However their brains have been corrupted by the overseas philosophies of the Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxism. In the event that they hate America a lot, they need to simply depart!”
Instance #2
“These conservatives declare that America has Marxist components. However their brains have been corrupted by the overseas philosophies of fascism and Nazism. In the event that they hate America a lot, they need to simply depart!”
