The Real Happiness Machine | Daily Philosophy

The tales of Ray Bradbury make for great bedtime studying. They aren’t simply intelligent and entertaining but in addition, though they had been written greater than 60 years in the past, extremely topical. In lots of them we will discover a complete philosophy of life that’s effectively value discovering and adopting, not the least as a result of it offers a potent antidote to a view of life that’s knowledgeable by deep resentment towards the pure human situation, prompting us to hunt salvation in technological progress and self-transformation and to worship particular person ‘autonomy,’ and inspiring contempt in direction of all that’s deemed peculiar. In accordance with this more and more dominant view, we can’t be completely completely satisfied so long as now we have to face limits to what we will do, there are issues we can not have, we can not maintain on to the issues that we do have, and we finally should die. Bradbury’s angle in direction of life (and dying) is refreshingly (and reassuringly) totally different.

One in every of my favorite tales, revealed in 1957, is named “The Happiness Machine,” and it’s concerning the ordinariness of happiness. Happiness is usually considered a state of exaltation, or at the least some form of subjective, constructive feeling that’s fascinating in its personal proper. It’s decidedly not regular, out of the peculiar, one thing to be desperately sought and, when discovered, jealously guarded. We generally really feel that in an effort to be completely satisfied, we want to have the ability to get pleasure from all the great issues in life, should be wholesome and match, younger and delightful, and fairly well-to-do. If all these situations are met, then and solely then can we rush off, from spotlight to focus on, and pursue happiness to all these fancy locations the place we imagine it’s to be discovered (or, extra doubtless, to be purchased).

This assumption is shared by the protagonist in Bradbury’s story. His identify is Leo Auffmann, and he has set his thoughts on developing a ‘happiness machine’. Lastly, after having tirelessly labored on it for some months or so, all of the whereas fully neglecting his spouse and kids and his personal well being, he has a end result, the machine is completed and it’s working. Nevertheless, to his dismay his spouse just isn’t the least within the machine, which, in her view, has nearly ruined her husband’s life, to not converse of their relationship: “Man was not made to tamper with such issues. It’s not towards God, no, nevertheless it certain appears prefer it’s towards Leo Auffmann. One other week of this and we’ll bury him in his machine!” And what’s all this synthetic happiness good for anyway, she asks, and flatly refuses even to present it a attempt. “In case you died from overwork, what ought to I do as we speak, climb in that large field down there and be completely satisfied?”

Then his son makes use of it and is completely depressing consequently. Leo doesn’t perceive. And when his spouse lastly offers in and decides that she is going to, in any case, check out the machine, the result’s disastrous. We hear her voice from inside. Apparently, she sees and hears and smells great locations, Paris, Rome, the Pyramids, feels herself to be dancing (probably not, in fact), gasps “Wonderful!”, after which – she begins to weep. It’s the saddest factor on the earth, she says when she comes out. She had by no means missed any of this, and now she does. Now she desires to see Paris, however is aware of that she will be able to’t and gained’t. The machine let her really feel younger once more, however she is aware of she isn’t. It’s all a lie. Nothing of it’s actual. The happiness machine is in actual fact a disappointment machine. The issue is that now we have to return to actuality, and actuality just isn’t like that: there are soiled dishes to be washed, beds to be made, kids to be fed.

Furthermore, it isn’t even fascinating to have these great experiences on a regular basis and everytime you wish to:

“Let’s be frank, Leo, how lengthy are you able to have a look at a sundown? Who desires a sundown to final? Who desires excellent temperature? Who desires air smelling good at all times? So after some time, who would discover? Higher, for a minute or two, a sundown. After that, let’s have one thing else. … Sunsets we at all times favored as a result of they solely occur as soon as and go away.”

When Leo replies that that is really very unhappy, this briefness, the ephemeral nature of the great, she says: “No, if the sundown stayed and we bought bored, that might be an actual disappointment.”

Let’s be frank, Leo, how lengthy are you able to have a look at a sundown? Who desires a sundown to final? 

Ultimately, the machine catches hearth and so they let it burn till it’s no extra. They will now return to their lives, that are very peculiar certainly, however not so dangerous in any case, again to “placing books again on cabinets, and garments again in closets, fixing supper” and different peculiar issues like that. After which Leo lastly discovers “the actual Happiness Machine”, which is a life that’s shared with different folks, doing on a regular basis issues, and being there for one another. Nothing extra is required:

There sat Saul and Marshall, taking part in chess on the espresso desk. Within the eating room Rebecca was laying out the silver. Naomi was slicing paper-doll attire. Ruth was portray water colours. Joseph was working his electrical prepare. Via the kitchen door, Lena Auffmann was sliding a pot roast from the steaming oven. Each hand, each head, each mouth made a giant or little movement. You might hear their faraway voices beneath glass. You might hear somebody singing in a excessive candy voice. You might scent bread baking, too, and also you knew it was actual bread that might quickly be coated with actual butter. Every little thing was there and it was working.

Naturally, all this must finish sooner or later. Issues will cease working and what was there earlier than will not be. However that’s no cause to worth it any much less, nor to despair over its passing. Demise, when it comes on the finish of a well-lived life, just isn’t an ethical outrage that now we have to wage battle towards. The prospect of it and the data of its inevitability doesn’t even should make our lives any much less completely satisfied.

We are able to be taught this from yet one more of Bradbury’s tales, additionally revealed in 1957. It’s known as “The Depart-Taking”, and it is vitally brief and probably not a lot of a narrative in any respect. What occurs is that an previous lady dies. At some point she decides that sufficient is sufficient and he or she lies down and stops dwelling. Not that her life is dangerous in any approach. She lives together with her prolonged household, appears to be well-loved and cared-for, and loving and caring herself. She has had a superb life and continues to be having one. However that doesn’t make her cling to her life so long as doable, as we’d anticipate. Quite the opposite. It’s the cause why she finds it simple to go. She has seen all the things value seeing, carried out all the things value doing, and it’s merely time to go:

Now it was as if an enormous sum in arithmetic had been lastly drawing to an finish. She had stuffed turkeys, chickens, squabs, gents, and boys. She had washed ceilings, partitions, invalids, and kids. She had laid linoleum, repaired bicycles, wound clocks, stoked furnaces, swabbed iodine on ten thousand grievous wounds. Her palms had flown throughout about and down, gentling this, holding that, throwing baseballs, swinging shiny croquet mallets, seeding black earth, or fixing covers over dumplings, ragouts, and kids wildly strewn by slumber. She had pulled down shades, pinched out candles, turned switches, and – grown previous. Trying again on thirty billion of issues began, carried, completed and carried out, all of it summed up, totalled out; the final decimal was positioned, the ultimate zero swung slowly into line. Now, chalk in hand, she stood again from life a silent hour earlier than reaching for the eraser.

When her determination to die turns into identified to the household, her grandchildren attempt to change her thoughts – they want her, will miss her, don’t wish to be with out her. She, nonetheless, insists that there isn’t any cause to be unhappy. When one has lived for a very long time, it’s beginning to really feel like one has been watching too many films in a row, and when that occurs, “when the time comes that the identical cowboys are taking pictures the identical Indians on the identical mountaintop, then it’s finest to fold again the seat and head for the door, with no regrets and no strolling backward up the aisle. So, I’m leaving whereas I’m nonetheless completely satisfied and nonetheless entertained.” And anyway, she says, she’s probably not leaving. It’s in actual fact solely a small and insignificant a part of her that may disappear. Simply as we don’t mourn a clipped fingernail, we also needs to not mourn the passing of an individual, as a result of an individual is, similar to the fingernail, solely part of a bigger complete, which continues to exist even when that specific particular person is gone, similar to the physique lives on when it loses a few of its cells to get replaced by others.

Necessary factor just isn’t the me that’s mendacity right here, however the me that’s sitting on the sting of the mattress trying again at me, and the me that’s downstairs cooking supper, or out within the storage beneath the automotive, or within the library studying. All the brand new components, they depend. I’m probably not dying as we speak. No particular person ever died that had a household.

Personally, I discover this imaginative and prescient surprisingly compelling. In actual fact, it appears to me that even with no household, with out kids, now we have each cause to see our particular person selves as being components of a larger, extra encompassing self, which lives on and by which we reside on even when ‘we’ are useless. The boundaries of the self are, in any case, not clearly outlined. The place we finish largely relies on the place we see or suppose ourselves ending. I can see myself in you, can determine myself with all the human group, and even with the group of all dwelling beings, and if and after I do, then there isn’t any cause to concern my very own dying as a result of I do know I’ll reside on in others. This isn’t merely wishful pondering. We’re actually actual as people. We do expertise ourselves as separate from others. However we additionally expertise the connection, and the connection, our being-with others and the world by which we discover ourselves, is in some ways extra elementary than the separation. We’re linked, distributed beings, and for many who reside that connection, dying is not such a terrifying prospect.

Now we have each cause to see our particular person selves as being components of a larger, extra encompassing self, which lives on and by which we reside on even when ‘we’ are useless. 

Bradbury’s story ends with the dying of the previous lady, however her dying is extra like a home-coming. It’s described as if life had been a short interruption from one thing else, one thing at the least equally good: “A very long time again, she thought, I dreamed a dream, and was having fun with it a lot when somebody wakened me, and that was the day after I was born.” When she lies dying, she is attempting to select up the thread of that dream, after which, in her final moments, she finds it.

“It’s all proper,” whispered Nice-grandma, because the dream floated her. “Like all the things else on this life, it’s becoming.”

And with this superb belief within the fittingness of all issues, of each life and dying, the story ends.

◊ ◊ ◊

Michael Hauskeller is Professor of Philosophy and Head of the Philosophy Division on the College of Liverpool, UK. He focuses on ethical and existential philosophy, however has additionally carried out work in varied different areas, most notably phenomenology (the speculation of atmospheres), the philosophy of artwork and sweetness, and the philosophy of human enhancement.

His publications embody Biotechnology and the Integrity of Life (Routledge 2007), Better Humans? Understanding the Enhancement Project (Routledge 2013), Sex and the Posthuman Condition (Palgrave Macmillan 2014), The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television (ed. with T. Philbeck and C. Carbonell, Palgrave 2015), Mythologies of Transhumanism (Palgrave Macmillan 2016), Moral Enhancement. Critical Perspectives (ed. with L. Coyne, Cambridge College Press 2018), and The Meaning of Life and Death (Bloomsbury 2019).

Cowl picture by Ayanna Johnson on Unsplash.

Share this: