How Masks Make You Sick Instead of Protecting You

Through the COVID-19 pandemic, 80% of U.S. states mandated masks to gradual the unfold of SARS-CoV-2, however accumulating analysis reveals masks mandates and use don’t decrease the unfold of the virus.¹ Whereas guidelines requiring masks did enhance compliance, they did not translate to decrease transmission development charges, whether or not neighborhood unfold of SARS-CoV-2 was low or excessive.

Even earlier than COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, masks mandates had been put in place with out ever correctly evaluating efficacy, however that did not cease them from dividing communities and getting used as a type of advantage signaling and a visual reminder of compliance with the “new regular.”

Now, with analysis exhibiting not solely that masks do not shield you however may very well make you sick, the rationale behind their widespread mandated utilization should be questioned.

Masks Mandates Did not Decrease COVID-19 Instances

Utilizing CDC information, researchers with the College of Louisville calculated complete COVID-19 case development and masks use for the U.S. No important variations had been present in case development between mandate and non-mandate states in periods of low or excessive transmission.

“Surges had been equivocal,” they famous, concluding, “Masks mandates and use usually are not related to slower state-level COVID-19 unfold throughout COVID-19 development surges.”² Whereas stating that their findings “don’t help the speculation that SARS-CoV-2 transmission charges lower with larger public masks use,” they did notice that “masks could promote social cohesion as rallying symbols throughout a pandemic.”³

Equally dismal outcomes from masks mandates had been demonstrated in Europe. A examine revealed in Cureus analyzed information from 35 European international locations, together with morbidity, mortality and masks utilization, over a six-month interval. The researchers famous:⁴

“Masks mandates had been carried out in nearly all world international locations and in most locations the place masks weren’t compulsory, their use in public areas was really helpful … These mandates and proposals befell even supposing most randomized managed trials carried out earlier than and through the COVID-19 pandemic concluded that the function of masks in stopping respiratory viral transmission was small, null, or inconclusive.”

When the info had been analyzed, the examine additionally revealed that the widespread use of masks didn’t scale back COVID-19 transmission. Worse, a reasonable constructive correlation was discovered between masks utilization and deaths in Western Europe, which “means that the common use of masks could have had dangerous unintended penalties.”⁵

Masks Mandates in Faculties Did not Cut back COVID-19 Instances

As a part of the federal government sponsored propaganda marketing campaign, a broadly cited CDC examine, revealed in October 2021, reported that counties with out college masks mandates had bigger will increase in COVID-19 case charges in kids after the beginning of faculty in contrast with counties that had college masks mandates.⁶

The examine was used to help college masks mandates, however a staff of researchers revisited the analysis, incorporating a bigger pattern measurement and longer examine interval. The up to date examine,⁷ revealed in Might 2022, used almost six instances extra information in comparison with the unique examine and located no important relationship between masks mandates in U.S. colleges and COVID-19 case charges. In accordance with the researchers:⁸

“We failed to ascertain a relationship between college masking and pediatric instances utilizing the identical strategies however a bigger, extra nationally numerous inhabitants over an extended interval. Our examine demonstrates that observational research of interventions with small to reasonable impact sizes are liable to bias brought on by choice and omitted variables. Randomized research can extra reliably inform public well being coverage.”

On Twitter, surgeon and public coverage researcher Dr. Marty Makary identified that the CDC’s authentic examine appeared to incorporate cherry-picked information and the company refused to publish an replace utilizing the extra in depth information:⁹

“This examine demonstrates how the CDC was cherry-picking information to help their college masks dogma. The article states that CDC’s MMWR journal rejected publishing this re-analysis. More than likely as a result of it uncovered the CDCs salami-slicing of information & use of science as political propaganda.”

It needs to be famous {that a} earlier CDC examine discovered masks necessities for college kids had little impact on COVID-19 incidence in Georgia colleges, whereas improved air flow, akin to opening a window, diminished instances greater than masks mandates for workers and academics.¹⁰

The Foegen Impact: Masks Mandates Elevated COVID-19 Deaths

A profoundly vital examine was performed by German doctor Dr. Zacharias Fögen to seek out out whether or not obligatory masks use influenced the COVID-19 case fatality fee in Kansas from August 1, 2020, to October 15, 2020.¹¹ He selected the state of Kansas as a result of, whereas it issued a masks mandate, counties had been allowed to both decide in or out of it.

His evaluation revealed that counties with a masks mandate had considerably larger case fatality charges than counties with out a masks mandate. “These findings recommend that masks use would possibly pose a but unknown menace to the person as a substitute of defending them, making masks mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention,” he concluded.

That menace, he defined, could also be one thing referred to as the “Foegen impact” — the concept that deep re-inhalation of droplets and virions caught on facemasks would possibly make COVID-19 an infection extra probably or extra extreme.

“The basics of this impact are simply demonstrated when sporting a facemask and glasses on the identical time by pulling the higher fringe of the masks over the decrease fringe of the glasses. Droplets seem on the masks when respiration out and disappear when inhaling.”

“Within the “Foegen impact,” the virions unfold (due to their smaller measurement) deeper into the respiratory tract. They bypass the bronchi and are inhaled deep into the alveoli, the place they will trigger pneumonia as a substitute of bronchitis, which might be typical of a virus an infection.

Moreover, these virions bypass the multilayer squamous epithelial wall that they can not move into in vitro and most probably can’t move into in vivo. Subsequently, the one possible means for the virions to enter the blood vessels is thru the alveoli.”¹²

Carrying Masks May Be Associated to Lengthy COVID

Fögen defined that sporting masks may find yourself rising your total viral load as a result of, as a substitute of exhaling virions out of your respiratory tract and ridding your physique of them, these virions are caught within the masks and returned. This may also have the impact of accelerating the variety of virions that move by way of the masks, such that it turns into greater than the quantity that may have been shed with out a masks.

The truth that “hypercondensed droplets and pure virions within the masks may be blown outwards throughout expiration, leading to aerosol transmission as a substitute of droplet transmission” is one other difficulty that would make transmission worse as a substitute of higher, and using “extra protecting” masks may additionally backfire, making COVID-19’s long-term results worse. Fögen defined:¹³

“The usage of “higher” masks (e.g., FFP2, FFP3) with a better droplet-filtering capability most likely ought to trigger an excellent stronger “Foegen impact” as a result of the variety of virions which can be doubtlessly re-inhaled will increase in the identical means that outward shedding is diminished.

One other salient level is that COVID-19-related long-term results and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in kids could all be a direct reason for the “Foegen impact.” Virus entry into the alveoli and blood with out being restricted to the higher respiratory tract and bronchi and may trigger injury by initiating an (auto) immune response in most organs.”

Clear Dangers of Extended Masks Use

Two professional experiences spoke out towards using masks for youngsters in 2021. The primary, a psychology report,¹⁴ said that masks are more likely to be inflicting psychological hurt to kids and interfering with growth.¹⁵ “The extent of psychological hurt to younger folks is unknown,” the report said, “as a result of distinctive nature of the ‘social experiment’ presently underway in colleges, and in wider society.”¹⁶

The second report centered on well being, security and well-being,¹⁷ noting potential everlasting bodily injury to the lungs brought on by fibrosis from inhalation of fibrous nanoparticles.

“There are actual and important risks of respiratory an infection, oral well being deterioration and of lung harm, akin to pneumothorax, owing to moisture buildup and likewise publicity to doubtlessly dangerous ranges of an asphyxiant gasoline (carbon dioxide [CO2]) which may trigger critical harm to well being,” the authors defined.¹⁸

Usually, the CO2 then dissipates into the air round you earlier than you’re taking one other breath. Within the open air, carbon dioxide sometimes exists at about 400 elements per million (ppm), or 0.04% by quantity.

The German Federal Environmental Workplace set a restrict of CO2 for closed rooms of two,000 ppm, or 0.2% by quantity. In case you’re sporting a facemask, the CO2 can’t escape because it often does and as a substitute turns into trapped within the masks. In a examine revealed in JAMA Pediatrics, researchers analyzed the CO2 content material of inhaled air amongst kids sporting two kinds of masks, in addition to sporting no masks.¹⁹

Whereas no important distinction in CO2 was discovered between the 2 kinds of masks, there was a big elevation when sporting masks in comparison with not sporting them. CO2 in inhaled air beneath surgical and filtering facepiece masks got here in between 13,120 ppm and 13,910 ppm, “which is larger than what’s already deemed unacceptable by the German Federal Environmental Workplace by an element of 6,” the researchers famous.²⁰

Additionally vital, this degree was reached after solely three minutes, whereas kids put on masks at college for a imply of 270 minutes at a time. Even the kid who had the bottom measured CO2 degree had a measurement three-fold larger than the closed room CO2 restrict of 0.2%. Nonetheless, youthful kids appeared to have the best CO2 values; a degree of 25,000 ppm was measured from a 7-year-old sporting a facemask.²¹

Bacterial An infection Threat, Issues With Social Studying

The total penalties of extended masks use are solely starting to be understood. The College of Louisville researchers famous, nonetheless, that utilizing a masks for greater than 4 hours per day “promotes facial alkalinization and inadvertently encourages dehydration, which in flip can improve barrier breakdown and bacterial an infection threat.”²² Different reported opposed results embrace:²³

After a lawsuit was introduced by Leslie Manookian’s Well being Freedom Protection Fund (HFDF), U.S. District Decide Kathryn Kimball Mizelle lastly voided the CDC’s U.S. masks mandate on airplanes and public transit in April 2022.²⁴ The U.S. Division of Justice (DoJ) has appealed the courtroom order,²⁵ nonetheless, making it clear that they do not intend to surrender on masks mandates with out a battle. In response, HFDF issued the next assertion:²⁶

“DoJ’s assertion [that it would appeal] is perplexing to say the least and sounds prefer it comes from well being coverage advocates not authorities legal professionals. The ruling by the US District Court docket ruling is a matter of legislation, not CDC desire or an evaluation of ‘present well being situations.’

If there’s actually a public well being emergency with clear and irrefutable science supporting CDC’s masks mandate, does it not warrant pressing motion? Why would DoJ and CDC not instantly enchantment?

HFDF is left with no possibility however to conclude that the Masks Mandate is mostly a political matter and by no means about pressing public well being points or the calls for of sound science. Whereas DoJ and CDC play politics with Individuals’ well being and freedoms, HFDF trusts particular person Individuals to make their very own well being selections.

HFDF is assured that Individuals possess ample widespread sense and schooling to know that there are actual questions on masks efficacy and threat and that CDC’s coverage displays neither.”

You may help the Well being Freedom Protection Fund and push again towards the DoJ and CDC by taking to social media. Please observe and/or just like the HFDF on the next platforms, share their content material, and invite your followers to do the identical:

• Instagram: @healthfreedomdefensefund
• Twitter: @theHFDF
• Fb: @healthfreedomdefensefund
• Telegram: @HealthFreedomDefense
• MeWe: Health Freedom Defense Fund