BY KIM BELLARD
All of us – effectively, most of us – attempt to be agreeable. It’s often a greater social lubricant to say “sure” than “no.” It’s extensively thought of to be higher in your profession to be the one who all the time says “sure” as an alternative of being the troublesome employee who typically says “no.” “Sure, expensive” is a safer marital technique than “no” or “not once more.” However, like most typical wisdoms, these should be challenged.
I’ve learn a number of articles lately the place “no” is the urged technique, and I believe there’s one thing there. Particularly for healthcare.
————–
The primary is a enjoyable, fascinating, presumably far-reaching article in Nature, “Why four scientists spent a year saying no.” The authors are “a gaggle of mid-career environmental social scientists” who felt they had been saying “sure” to too many commitments. Consequently, they determined to not solely be extra deliberate about saying no but in addition to trace it. Their purpose was to collectively decline 100 work-related requests, which they hit in March 2022.
It’s more durable than you may assume; because the authors warn: “It includes rethinking priorities and empowering ourselves and our colleagues to set boundaries.” They needed to neglect FOMO (concern of lacking out) and embrace JOMO (pleasure of lacking out), with a purpose to create extra room for intentional “sure.”
They provide 4 insights concerning the discovered ability of claiming “no”:
- Monitoring helped make “no” an possibility;
- Say no extra typically advert to bigger asks;
- Saying no is emotional work;
- Follow makes “no” simpler.
It’s typically so tempting to simply say “sure,” however we’ve all solely bought a lot time and power. Generally “no” is the very best reply.
————-
Generally, although, the saying “no” isn’t out loud; typically we are saying no by our actions. Which leads me to a brand new development: “quiet quitting.”
That is one other TikTok trend, began by one person (@zkchillin) in July and shortly going viral. The mainstream press is throughout it, with articles in WSJ, NYT, NPR, and CNN, amongst others. Regardless of what it appears like, quiet quitting isn’t ghosting your employer, simply strolling away out of your job with out resignation or different declaration of leaving. In reality, it doesn’t contain quitting in any respect.
Quiet quitting rejects the notion that staff are presupposed to all the time attempt to go above and past. It rejects the notion that work life is extra vital than life outdoors work. It encourages folks to say “no’ extra at work inside mechanically saying “sure” to requests that they tackle extra duties or longer hours. It doesn’t imply doing the naked minimal required to maintain your job, however it insists on solely doing the issues the job requires and pays them to do, throughout the hours they’re presupposed to be doing them.
It’s a Gen Z factor. One 24-year-old TikToker, Zaid Khan, said: “You’re quitting the thought of going above and past. You’re now not subscribing to the hustle-culture mentality that work needs to be your life.”
Healthcare, in fact, shudders on the considered quiet quitting. What would occur if nurses wouldn’t work all those extra shifts? What would have occurred if docs and different medical professionals had refused to see COVID-19 sufferers when PPE was missing and nobody fairly knew how harmful COVID was or find out how to deal with it? What would occur if main care docs stopped trying to fit 26 hours of work right into a “regular” workday? What would occur if physicians stated it’s ridiculous that they must spend two hours a day outside work hours on EHR tasks?
Healthcare as we all know it will crumble…as possibly it ought to.
————-
Final however not least, typically healthcare professionals must be saying “no” loud and clear, as urged in a NEJM Perspective by Matthew Okay. Wynia, M.D., M.P.H.:Professional Civil Disobedience — Medical-Society Responsibilities after Dobbs
The core query, Dr. Wynia, posits, is: “What ought to medical professionals do when a regulation requires them to hurt a affected person?” He’s referring, in fact, to restrictions on medical follow imposed by numerous state abortion legal guidelines within the wake of the Dobbs choice. He then asks the corollary query: “When these legal guidelines immediately and instantly threaten the well being of sufferers, ought to physicians collectively disobey them — that’s, ought to they interact in skilled civil disobedience?”
Healthcare has loads of organizations that collectively declare to advocate for its constituents – the AMA, numerous specialty organizations, the American Nurses Affiliation, and so forth. Cynically, these are sometimes used to argue to greater pay and/or higher working situations, fairly than for the very best pursuits of sufferers. Generally they do take ethical stances, together with (as Dr. Wynia factors out) their considerations concerning the implications of Dobbs. However really taking motion, of threating work stoppages or boycotts? That’s a step they hardly ever take, and one Dr. Wynia believes it’s time for.
“Too typically,” he laments, “organized drugs has failed to satisfy its obligation to guard sufferers when doing so required performing towards state authority.” Dr. Wynia wonders: “How lengthy might a harmful state regulation survive if the medical career, as a complete, refused to be intimidated into harming sufferers, even when such a refusal meant that many physicians may go to jail?”
Not lengthy, I’d guess.
The hazard, he warns, is that: “…when a society takes a incorrect flip and medical professionals go alongside, distrust in drugs grows and both social change should be pushed by different teams or the society fails.” In different phrases, time for the medical career to say no, not less than with regards to any restrictions that impression the very best care of their sufferers.
——————
Usually, I’m somebody who’s intrigued by new concepts, who is happy about innovation, who needs to see change – all issues that sign saying “sure.” However saying “sure” to too many issues typically successfully means implicitly saying no to most of them; we are able to solely accomplish that a lot directly, we are able to solely settle for a lot change at a time. Saying “no” extra typically, and extra strategically, permits us to deal with the issues we should say “sure” to.
In healthcare, sufferers are too typically pressured to simply accept “sure” to issues they’d actually wish to say “no”
to. Physicians and different healthcare professionals are sometimes pressured to comply with work practices and restrictions that they know they need to say “no” to. And each sufferers and healthcare professionals are discovering that legislators are performing in methods which can be at odds with our greatest pursuits.
Time to say “no.”
Kim is a former emarketing exec at a significant Blues plan, editor of the late & lamented Tincture.io, and now common THCB contributor.
