Of Validity, Soundness, and Sarah Palin as a Russian Spy: A Critical Thinking Lesson.

I make use of a section from The Every day Present with Jon Stewart titled “From Russia with Gov” (2011 season) in my vital pondering class for instance validity, soundness, and enthymematic arguments.

You could find the video clip right here: FROM RUSSIA WITH GOV

The clip begins with the previous Alaska governor Sarah Palin making a cryptic vital comment about President Obama’s speech. Stewart seizes on this seeming slip of the tongue to assemble an elaborate idea aimed to indicate that Sarah Palin is definitely a Russian spy.  Full with a montage of Palin making extra curious claims, Stewart constructs two arguments (one invalid and one legitimate—but each unsound) to ascertain his outlandish conclusion. The clip is comparatively quick, which is why I normally play it in its entirety within the class.

The primary argument that Stewart makes is helpful for illustrating the fallacy of affirming the ensuing:

P1: If Sarah Palin had been a Soviet agent, she would have made some reference favoring a totalitarian state.

P2: Sarah Palin has made a reference favoring a totalitarian state.

C: Subsequently, Sarah Palin is a Soviet agent.

Setting apart the truth that Stewart vacillates between ‘Soviet’ and ‘Russian’, the argument he comes up with is fallacious. The scholars can simply present how the premises will be true, but they will present counterexamples that render the conclusion false.

The second, extra elaborate argument, is an enthymematic argument—it’s lacking a key premise that’s by no means explicitly said. But the premise is implied, and it’s crucial for the conclusion of the argument to be established. Stewart supplies one other montage of the premises that appear to implicate Palin:

P1: Sarah Palin is most comfy in lengthy, Northern winters.

P2: Sarah Palin’s favourite coloration is purple.

P3: Sarah Palin has an affinity to bears, which is the mascot of Russia.

C: Subsequently, Sarah Palin is a Russian spy, like Natasha from Bullwinkle.

As said, the argument doesn’t fairly undergo as said. As is, the connection between the premises and the conclusion is closely implied, however it isn’t made specific. The lacking premise will be said as follows:

P4 (implied): Solely Russian spies are most comfy in lengthy, Northern winters, have purple as their favourite coloration, and have an affinity to bears.

Now, with the premise P4 included, the conclusion does observe: premises P1 by means of P4 do help the conclusion, C. The scholars are given the prospect to offer the premise P4 as an train, and so they haven’t any bother in filling in a premise which renders the argument legitimate. Nonetheless, as soon as the lacking premise is provided, it turns into apparent that it’s false, which renders the argument unsound.

The falsity of the lacking premise is well established by soliciting counterexamples to the conjunction.

The clip in its entirety matches properly with the supplies from Lewis Vaughn’s The Energy of Essential Pondering (6^th version). Chapter three of Vaughn’s textbook covers argument fundamentals, together with the notions of validity and soundness. Furthermore, the chapter discusses methods to take care of arguments which are lacking components (enthymematic arguments). Given how these subjects are lined in most crucial pondering textbooks, the usefulness of the clip transcends a selected textbook. These central concepts are properly represented within the Every day Present clip, which supplies a memorable illustration past the textbook definitions.

The Teaching and Learning Video Series is designed to share pedagogical approaches to utilizing video clips, and humorous ones specifically, for instructing philosophy. Humor, when used appropriately, has empirically been proven to correlate with larger retention charges. In case you are fascinated by contributing to this collection, please electronic mail the Collection Editor, William A. B. Parkhurst, at parkhurw@gvsu.edu.