Jim Edmonds calls out ex-wife Meghan King after she claims he didn’t invite kids to Italian wedding

0
101


Jim Edmonds lashed out at his ex-wife Meghan King following Tuesday’s episode of her podcast Intimate Knowledge.

Through the episode, the 38-year-old former Actual Housewives Of Orange County star claimed that the 52-year-old former baseball star didn’t hassle to ask their three kids to his wedding ceremony to Kortnie O’Connor in Italy‘s Lake Como late final month. 

In a press release to People, a consultant for Jim described his ex-wife’s feedback as ‘fixed harassment’ and stated they have been ‘each disgraceful and pathetic on the identical time.’

Striking back: Jim Edmonds lashed out at ex-wife Meghan King following Tuesday's episode of her podcast Intimate Knowledge, calling her comments 'disgraceful and pathetic' after she claimed that he didn't invite their kids to his Italian wedding; seen October 2021

Placing again: Jim Edmonds lashed out at ex-wife Meghan King following Tuesday’s episode of her podcast Intimate Information, calling her feedback ‘disgraceful and pathetic’ after she claimed that he didn’t invite their children to his Italian wedding ceremony; seen October 2021

On her podcast, which featured visitor Heather McDonald, Meghan stated the Italian wedding ceremony was ‘very small,’ and surprisingly passed off on her birthday, September 26.

She was complimentary towards Kortnie, saying that the bride’s costume was ‘stunning,’ and he or she stated that ‘hopefully’ their marriage ‘will final,’ not like his three earlier marriages.

Nevertheless, Meghan included a jab at her ex when she stated it was ‘attention-grabbing that he had a nanny there, however none of his seven kids.

‘There was no children to nanny on the wedding ceremony!’ she stated.

Meghan included a jab at her ex when she said it was 'interesting that he had a nanny there, but none of his seven children.' She said daughter Aspen, five, and twin sons Hayes and Hart, four, 'weren't even invited, as far as I know'; seen in 2016

Meghan included a jab at her ex when she said it was 'interesting that he had a nanny there, but none of his seven children.' She said daughter Aspen, five, and twin sons Hayes and Hart, four, 'weren't even invited, as far as I know'; seen in 2016

Meghan included a jab at her ex when she stated it was ‘attention-grabbing that he had a nanny there, however none of his seven kids.’ She stated daughter Aspen, 5, and twin sons Hayes and Hart, 4, ‘weren’t even invited, so far as I do know’; seen in 2016

Mixed bag: Meghan was otherwise complimentary about Jim's 'very small' ceremony in Italy with new wife Kortnie O'Connor. She also praised Kortnie's dress as 'very beautiful'

Mixed bag: Meghan was otherwise complimentary about Jim's 'very small' ceremony in Italy with new wife Kortnie O'Connor. She also praised Kortnie's dress as 'very beautiful'

Blended bag: Meghan was in any other case complimentary about Jim’s ‘very small’ ceremony in Italy with new spouse Kortnie O’Connor. She additionally praised Kortnie’s costume as ‘very stunning’

Meghan stated that their daughter Aspen, 5, and their twin sons Hayes and Hart, 4, ‘weren’t even invited, so far as I do know. They don’t even have passports and he didn’t ask me to get them a passport.’

Within the assertion through his consultant, Edmonds blasted the previous actuality star’s feedback. 

‘Meghan continues to maintain herself within the public eye by disparaging Jim, after which complains to anybody who will hear that coparenting is troublesome,’ they stated. ‘Meghan must concentrate on getting the assistance she wants to guide a productive and significant life.’

Notably, the assertion didn’t straight contradict Meghan’s declare that their kids weren’t invited to the Italian wedding ceremony, or provide any purpose why they didn’t attend.

Furious: 'Meghan continues to keep herself in the public eye by disparaging Jim, and then complains to anyone who will listen that coparenting is difficult,' Jim's rep said without providing any evidence that Meghan was incorrect

Furious: 'Meghan continues to keep herself in the public eye by disparaging Jim, and then complains to anyone who will listen that coparenting is difficult,' Jim's rep said without providing any evidence that Meghan was incorrect

Livid: ‘Meghan continues to maintain herself within the public eye by disparaging Jim, after which complains to anybody who will hear that coparenting is troublesome,’ Jim’s rep stated with out offering any proof that Meghan was incorrect

Elsewhere in her podcast, Meghan shared that she and Jim now have a frosty relationship through which they now not talk with one another.

Nevertheless, she claimed that it may beforehand be fiery when explaining why she go a short lived restraining order in opposition to him in June of this 12 months. 

In courtroom paperwork beforehand obtained by People, Meghan claimed that she ‘needed to endure frequent and constant verbal abuse’ from the retired athlete.

She claimed that he violated their ‘parenting plan’ by being verbally abusive to her each through digital means like textual content messages, and even in particular person, typically ‘within the presence of minor kids.’ 

On her podcast, Meghan defined {that a} compromise made the restraining order a ‘consent order,’ which additionally makes calls for on her conduct. 

‘We ended up turning it right into a consent order that has all the identical phrases as a restraining order however now it’s reciprocal, so I’ve to comply with it as nicely,’ she defined.

Equal: Meghan also revealed that a restraining order filed against her ex for verbal abuse was changed to a 'consent order,' which holds her to the same standards; seen September 23

Equal: Meghan also revealed that a restraining order filed against her ex for verbal abuse was changed to a 'consent order,' which holds her to the same standards; seen September 23

Equal: Meghan additionally revealed {that a} restraining order filed in opposition to her ex for verbal abuse was modified to a ‘consent order,’ which holds her to the identical requirements; seen September 23

‘I comply with the foundations so no matter, it doesn’t make any distinction to me,’ she claimed, including, ‘It’s good for Jim and I as a result of we don’t need to see one another or talk besides concerning the children, which is good.’

Meghan stated the mutual order had considerably improved her relationship with Jim, as he had allegedly let their disagreements spill over into communications with their kids’s college.

Previous to the order, she claimed he had despatched ‘some nasty messages,’ however in a single notably mortifying occasion, he ‘replied all to my son’s class and stated that I suck.’

‘He replied all to my son’s class, an enormous, enormous electronic mail for a mother or father–instructor join sheet, and stated “You all can see how a lot my ex-wife sucks,”‘ she stated.

Fortunately, a few of the mother and father included within the electronic mail thread despatched her messages of help, although she didn’t even know who they have been as a result of her kids had only recently began attending the college. 

The couple initially separated in October 2019, 5 years after getting married, within the wake of dishonest rumors that dogged Jim. They finalized their divorce in Could 2021.

Childish: Prior to the order, she claimed he had sent 'some nasty messages,' but in one particularly mortifying instance, he 'replied all to my son's class and said that I suck'; seen in 2018

Childish: Prior to the order, she claimed he had sent 'some nasty messages,' but in one particularly mortifying instance, he 'replied all to my son's class and said that I suck'; seen in 2018

Infantile: Previous to the order, she claimed he had despatched ‘some nasty messages,’ however in a single notably mortifying occasion, he ‘replied all to my son’s class and stated that I suck’; seen in 2018

Supply: | Dailymail.co.uk


LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here