Up for dialogue: the next two claims (together with their presuppositions, ambiguities, and so on).
“In the event you suppose synthetic intelligence might enhance philosophy, then you definately’re mistaken a couple of central level of philosophy.”
“In the event you suppose synthetic intelligence might not enhance philosophy, then you definately’re mistaken a couple of central level of philosophy.”
(Prompted by the consideration of a distinction between expertise that alleviates the necessity for human pondering and expertise that improves it, as raised in a Twitter thread by Zachary Pirtle.)
Associated:
The Distant Future of Philosophy
“Hey Sophi”, or How Much Philosophy Will Computers Do?
Will Computers Do Philosophy?
