Feminist authorized and political thinker Jean Hampton was not alone when she argued in 1998 that gender-based violence is “perhaps the most important tool in the oppression of women.” Most feminist philosophers would agree that ending gender-based violence is an important aim of attaining gender justice.
In fact, that is a lot simpler stated than executed.
Because the late Eighties, one main device that some feminist activists have employed within the battle in opposition to gender-based violence is the prison authorized system. In the previous couple of many years, criticisms of the American prison authorized system, particularly surrounding its disproportionate impression on black individuals, have brought on many feminists to query whether or not or not the prison regulation can be utilized to advance feminist targets.
In fact, answering this query requires empirical investigation, not solely normative debate. However some philosophers have valued prison punishment as a feminist end-in-itself. All through the Nineties, Hampton made the case that the prison authorized system may provide a compelling purpose to punish those that commit gender-based violence due to prison punishment’s distinctive capability to specific ethical condemnation. This argument didn’t depend on the declare that elevated prosecution or punishment of gender-based crimes would deter them, however as an alternative argued for the intrinsic worth of punishment as expression of the sufferer’s worth. Particularly, she made the case that when a authorities punishes those that commit gender-based violence, it expresses ladies’s equal worth.
Although Hampton’s argument has intuitive attraction, I elevate issues about feminist political exercise aimed toward strengthening the prison justice response to gender-based violence based mostly on expressivist arguments. I don’t, nonetheless, recommend something about how particular person victims of such violence ought to search justice, security, or assist.
Whereas punishment can categorical the equal worth of ladies and condemn the structural mistaken of gender-based violence in an idealized world, in america (and Canada), the expressive energy of punishment is simply too blunt to convey nuanced messages about gender-based violence. These messages are usually drowned out by different, extra highly effective sexist messages or co-opted by racist messages. In fact, this argument by itself doesn’t provide conclusive proof that feminists ought to not use prison regulation, but it surely does undermine one intuitively interesting purpose for doing so.
Hampton’s Endorsement of Punishment’s Capability to Categorical Girls’s Price
Hampton integrated insights from Joel Feinberg’s explication of the expressivist functions of punishment to develop a feminist penal expressivism that facilities on prison regulation and punishment’s capability to speak ethical norms. For Hampton, the American and Canadian prison authorized programs categorical dominant social values, and the failure to prosecute and punish rapists is emblematic of the systemic lack of worth ladies’s lives have in these societies. Hampton writes:
“When a critical wrongdoer will get a mere slap on the wrist after performing an act that diminished her sufferer, the punisher ratifies the view that the sufferer is certainly the form of being who’s low relative to the wrongdoer. When the American courts, till just lately, responded to spousal abusers with gentle punishment or no punishment in any respect, they have been expressing the view that girls have been certainly the chattel of their husbands. When the current day Canadian courts use a sentencing coverage that provides sure varieties of sexual offenders lighter sentences, on common, than these given to individuals who have been convicted of housebreaking, they’re accepting a view of ladies that grants them standing related to-but barely decrease than-mere objects.” (1691–1692)
As a result of prison prosecution and punishment are so strongly related to ethical condemnation, punishment has a particular capability to convey ethical norms. For Hampton, punishment is the suitable response to the mistaken of prison acts as a result of punishment expresses the worth of the sufferer and a condemnation of the wrongful act. In Hampton’s mannequin, prison acts are mistaken as a result of they categorical the concept that the perpetrator is extra necessary or priceless than the particular person they’re wronging (or, relying on the crime, the entire political neighborhood). Legal acts diminish the humanity of victims. For instance, not solely does rape trigger bodily and emotional hurt to the sufferer, however rape can also be an ethical mistaken as a result of the act expresses the rapist’s refusal of the sufferer’s equal humanity. Legal regulation, and punishment specifically, is the one approach to answer the mistaken of rape and different prison acts. Punishment is a counter-action that expresses the equal worth of the sufferer and demotes the perpetrator from the upper place he took for himself.
One needn’t tackle the total Kantian baggage of Hampton’s expressivist idea to endorse the fundamental concept that punishments categorical a neighborhood’s dedication to the worth of the sufferer and condemnation of acts that diminished her. Feinberg argues that punishment is uniquely capable of categorical our condemnation of the mistaken of rape and different crimes as a result of “sure types of exhausting therapy have change into the standard symbols of public reprobation.”
Hampton’s argument that prison acts categorical disrespect for his or her victims is supposed to justify all punishment practices, not simply punishment in response to gender-based violence. Nonetheless, Hampton frequently raises gender-based violence as a paradigmatic instance of the significance of punishment. Because the citation above highlights, she finds the relative under-prosecution and light-weight punishments of these crimes that the majority have an effect on ladies to be significantly indicative of structural sexism in america and Canada.
Hampton’s idea does appear to seize some robust intuitions. First, in america, the place incarceration charges are notoriously unmatched, our prison authorized system does categorical our values. Many feminists expressed outrage when Stanford swimmer Brock Turner was sentenced to solely 6 months in county jail after being discovered responsible of the sexual assault of Chanel Miller close to a frat occasion. The sunshine sentence and the judge’s words appeared to convey that Turner’s life was extra necessary than Chanel Miller’s. Hampton’s idea presents a philosophically nuanced clarification of this instinct.
Second, her account explains how the reticence to outline marital rape as a criminal offense—even at present, many state laws punish marital rape as much less critical than non-spousal rape—and the under-prosecution of home violence and rape stem from the ideological view that the federal government ought to not intervene within the household. Many feminists have executed lengthy and exhausting work to convey the non-public sphere out of the shadows and demand that justice lengthen into household life and different intimate arenas. Regardless of this work, the ideology of the separation of the private and non-private spheres nonetheless actively shapes a lot of our establishments and social practices and sure is at work within the lack of a significant prison response to gender-based violence. Hampton’s utility of punishment’s expressive energy to the circumstances of under-prosecution of gender-based violence in america highlights that such violence is structural. Reasonably than remoted situations of violence, gender-based violence is a component and parcel of gender oppression.
Punishment is Not a Good Automobile for Expressing Counter-hegemonic Messages
Whereas Hampton presents a useful analysis of the current state of affairs, her argument concerning the necessity of a punitive response to specific the worth of victims of gender-based violence raises two difficulties.
The prison authorized system by itself isn’t geared up to specific counter-hegemonic messages, significantly messages meant to undermine structural violence. Partly, it is because the prison authorized system isn’t truly designed to speak nuanced ethical concepts. Reasonably, the prison authorized system primarily examines the actions of people, presenting violence as an atomistic, one-off occasion. In contrast to the feminist view of gender-based violence as half and parcel of a much bigger construction of gender-based oppression, the prison regulation can solely handle acts of gender-based violence as remoted occasions. Courts (and extra typically, prosecutors who safe plea offers) decide if there may be sufficient proof to discover a prison defendant ‘responsible’ of violating a specific prison code, and victims solely play the position of witness. This uncooked materials of conviction and sentence size solely good points which means within the broader social context.
Punishment does actually categorical the hegemonic values of america, however solely as a result of that broader social context offers convictions and sentences which means. Merely trying to amp up the variety of prosecutions and the severity of punishment for gender-based crimes with out making headway on altering underlying gender norms has two doubtless outcomes: the message will likely be drowned out or co-opted.
The primary concern is that the ‘message’ of ladies’s equality will likely be drowned out by the opposite stereotypes, social norms, and energy dynamics that proscribe dominant views of gender roles, sexuality, and household life. Thus, even when extra convictions and longer sentences are secured, it’s unlikely that the broader message of the worth of ladies will likely be communicated. This leaves the structural downside of gender-based violence untouched.
I don’t need to downplay the significance, nonetheless, of securing convictions or punishments for particular person victims of gender-based violence. For a lot of, this may present many tangible and intangible advantages, together with security whereas abusers are incarcerated and the incalculable worth of being believed. Given the very actual shortage of societal, and particularly governmental, assist for victims of gender-based violence, that is no small factor. What’s extra, whereas I warning in opposition to endeavor political tasks aimed toward growing prison authorized responses to gender-based violence, I don’t criticize any selections particular person victims make about the best way to search justice, security, and different types of assist.
The second concern is that the ‘message’ of elevated prosecutions and extra extreme punishments will likely be co-opted by the racist ideological hyperlink between criminality and blackness in america. The prison authorized system in america is an expression of American values not solely in its unwillingness to answer gender-based violence. It additionally expresses robust messages of one other unjust establishment: the issue of anti-black racism and violence. As Steven Schwartzer has argued, “American policing and punishment categorical a dedication to racially derogatory, subordinating ideologies in a lot the identical approach that objectionable types of racial discourse do.”
One critical danger of trying to make use of the prison authorized system to specific the worth of ladies by growing prosecution and severity of punishment is that these people who find themselves already most closely focused by police and punishment, black males, will bear the brunt of this communication. Reasonably than reinforcing the counter-hegemonic message that girls are equally priceless, there’s a danger that these interventions within the prison authorized system will find yourself reinforcing the affiliation of blackness with criminality, given the present ideological background. As Megan Burke has demonstrated, the image of the Black rapist is still evident in many social norms and media images, and related stereotypes abound about Indigenous males and home abuse.
To this point, I’ve argued utilizing prison regulation to speak the equal worth of ladies could fail as a result of the social context of sexist ideology could drown out that message and the social context of racist ideology could co-opt that message.
One could argue that, for Hampton, the expression conveyed by punishment is an intrinsic good, whatever the approach that punishment is taken up and interpreted. However Hampton didn’t sufficiently attend to the truth that the which means of punishment as ethical condemnation relies on the social contexts that give which means to issues like responsible verdicts and severity of sentences. These social meanings are already intertwined with sexist and racist stereotypes that can have an effect on the very expression of those punishments as ethical condemnations of gender-based violence within the first place.
Within the political wrestle to finish gender-based violence, feminists ought to pay particular consideration to how the prison justice system has been legitimized by the putative aim of defending (white) ladies previously and the current. We must always due to this fact be extraordinarily cautious about utilizing this method to battle gender-based violence.
The Girls in Philosophy collection publishes posts on ladies within the historical past of philosophy, posts on problems with concern to ladies within the area of philosophy, and posts that put philosophy to work to deal with problems with concern to ladies within the wider world. In case you are all in favour of writing for the collection, please contact the Sequence Editor Adriel M. Trott or the Affiliate Editor Alida Liberman.
Amelia Wirts
Dr. Wirts is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at College of Washington, Seattle. She makes a speciality of philosophy of regulation, social and political philosophy, philosophy of race, and feminism. Her present challenge focuses on constructing a non-ideal idea method to philosophy of prison regulation in america.
