Kellan Head is a Ph.D. pupil at Syracuse College. His pursuits are largely metaethical: Kellan’s analysis primarily examines normativity and the character of worth, particularly within the epistemic realm. He’s additionally concerned about theories of well-being.
What’s your favourite e book of all time?
Nightwood by Djuna Barnes. It’s a reasonably quick novel revealed in 1936. Its most exceptional characteristic is its fantastically florid—however not cloying—prose. For my cash, Barnes’s writing model is just the perfect there may be. Another Excessive Modernist works can come off as pretentious due to their abstruseness. However whereas Nightwood is likely to be complicated, it’s not alienating. It’s capable of prolong its attraction past the merely educational and manages to be authentically fascinating.
What additionally resonates with me is the immense tenderness Nightwood is ready to specific, a tenderness I’ve not seen different authors come near efficiently embodying of their work. Barnes’s characters, purportedly primarily based on herself and her real-life acquaintances, are exceptionally vivid, and it’s the sympathy that she has for them which is so participating. The characters radiate with such unimaginable depth, and whereas studying you possibly can nearly really feel them current as actual, real, emotional beings past and undefined by any context of time, place, or scenario. They’re actual folks, simply as confused or annoyed or exuberant or love-drunk as we’re. However what stands out most is the truth that Barnes refuses to impart any judgment on them. No matter flaws a personality might need don’t come again to hang-out them like they’d in some hoary morality story. Like different modernist works, Nightwood tackles numerous existential themes, however regardless of its persistently darkish tone it’s ready to take action with an insightful, even heat, human sensitivity. Completely beneficial.
What are you engaged on proper now?
I’m placing the ultimate touches on a paper that argues towards ethical encroachment in epistemology. Ethical encroachment theorists declare that ethical concerns concerning a perception/perception state can encroach upon the epistemic and may immediately have an effect on the idea’s epistemic justificatory standing. I argue that is false and declare that the epistemic and the ethical are in truth separate, distinct normative realms. I level to circumstances by which it appears that evidently an agent is sacrificing an epistemic good in favor of an ethical good. If ethical encroachment had been true, brokers couldn’t have interaction in such a sacrifice.
I’m additionally writing a paper that examines alienation issues for judgment subjectivist theories of well-being. Judgment subjectivism says that our doxastic attitudes (judgments) set up our welfare items: x is an effective that positively contributes to our well-being iff we’ve the idea that x is nice for us. However I’m unconvinced. We will typically discover ourselves holding beliefs that don’t replicate ‘who we actually are’ particularly since our beliefs are sometimes on the mercy of no matter our proof occurs to be. Briefly: it’s attainable to imagine that some x is nice for us even once we are successfully alienated from x, and nothing alien might truly be good for us (in accordance with the core tenets of subjectivism).
In the end, my dissertation will look at the character of epistemic worth. I declare that there are (a minimum of) two distinct sorts of epistemic worth—worth derived from veracity and reality, and one other sort of worth (that also is wholly epistemic) which has to do with coherence and intelligibility. The second type of worth is the one achieved once we expertise the ‘making sense of’ phenomenon once we grasp a physique of data and perceive it.
In the event you might solely use one condiment for the remainder of your life, which condiment would you decide and why?
Mustard, every kind. However my favourite specifically is affordable, vivid yellow, plastic-bottle mustard. It’s so piquant and full of life. Since I used to be a really small individual, my go-to fast snack has been a mustard sandwich—two (or, once I’m feeling bold, three) items of plain bread caught along with goopy yellow mustard. Superb.
What excites you about philosophy?
I’m excited by the usual thrilling issues about philosophy: gaining readability of thought, buying extra data, spending time occupied with necessary matters, and many others. However one factor that I’ve observed doesn’t get talked about typically on this dialog is philosophy’s means to forge connections between people and communities. There’s one thing profoundly empathetic about holding and dealing with the identical ideas as others, or about (aiming at) understanding them and their subjective experiences. I feel it’s tough to do that once we’re tired of inquiring previous our personal subjective and fast worlds, or once we’re not keen to abide by the calls for of rationality. Philosophy can a minimum of purpose to stretch throughout the crevices that separate us from one another.
And right here once I speak about doing philosophy, I don’t imply doing strictly educational philosophy. I simply imply questioning assumptions, participating in dialogue with different folks, fostering a love for studying new issues, and holding your individual pondering and reasoning processes to sure requirements.
What’s your poison? (Favourite drink.)
I might wax Dionysian speaking about wine for hours, so as an alternative I’ll simply give attention to cocktails. My favourite is the Negroni. An equal measure of simply three substances: gin, Campari, and candy vermouth. What is phenomenal in regards to the Negroni is that it’s, so far as I’m involved, an ideal instance of an entire that’s higher than the sum of its elements. One way or the other, the unforgiving bitterness of Campari can harmonize with the spicy heat of gin, and the candy vermouth provides a cushty dried-fruit base that calms all the things down simply sufficient to make an extremely full and refreshing drink. The stability of the three parts is a fragile one which’s tough to duplicate, so I’m significantly impressed by slight variations on the Negroni which can be nonetheless capable of successfully do the Negroni factor.
Runner-up could be what’s known as a Scotch Violets. This time, 4 substances: reasonably smokey Scotch, a good quantity of crème de violette, honey syrup, and lemon juice. The proportions will differ primarily based on the power of the honey syrup and sort of Scotch used. I extremely suggest this.
This part of the APA Weblog is designed to get to know our fellow philosophers a bit higher. We’re together with profiles of APA members that highlight what captures their curiosity not solely contained in the workplace, but additionally exterior of it. We’d love so that you can be part of it, so please contact us through the interview nomination form here to appoint your self or a buddy.
