Jungsuk Lee is a Ph.D. pupil at UCLA, whose analysis focuses on historical Greek philosophy and ethics. Particularly, Aristotle’s and Neo-Aristotelian ethics. He’s at the moment engaged on a dissertation that explores the connection between the rational and the non-rational a part of the soul in Aristotle.
What’s your favourite factor that you just’ve written?
Relatively unusually, it’s a paper that I wrote once I was an undergrad. The paper was about how sure contexts and methods wherein music is listened to can have an effect on its aesthetic norms. After all, it’s a lot clumsier than my newer writings, is flawed at a number of ranges, and doesn’t even make a very deep philosophical level. Nonetheless, I prefer it for its spirit. Not figuring out something about pragmatic issues comparable to “trade requirements”, what’s stylish, what sort of paper is publishable, and so forth., I merely adopted the lead of the query that intrigued me and tried to go so far as I may. So regardless of all its flaws, the authenticity I see within the paper makes me cherish it (in addition to the particular person I used to be then). Whereas I do know that one can not reside just by such naïveté alone so long as one has chosen to do philosophy as a full-time job, I feel it’s equally true that with out it you may solely go to date. So for me, the paper is a form of private reminder of an angle that I typically have problem sustaining because of the strain that comes from professionalism.
What are you engaged on proper now?
I’m engaged on a number of tasks that may come beneath the heading of the connection between the rational and the non-rational a part of the soul in Aristotle, or the character of the calculative a part of the soul (to logistikon), attainment of whose excellences (e.g., technē and phronēsis) appear to require an fascinating form of refinement of the non-rational half and its concord with the rational half.
Extra particularly, one paper/dissertation chapter I’m engaged on discusses in what sense Aristotelian recollection is a form of reasoning regardless of its associative foundation and why the recollective college is claimed to go naturally (phusei) with the deliberative one (the paper might be delivered at this coming APA Pacific Division Assembly, by the best way). One other one makes an attempt to indicate methods wherein instructing for sensible knowledge and habituation for character-virtues are purported to be intertwined with one another with a purpose to make sense of the unity of virtues thesis (a part of this was offered on the final APA Central).
What matter do you suppose is beneath explored in philosophy?
Two issues come to my thoughts instantly simply because they should do with the tasks I’ve been engaged on. (1) Elements of rationality that can’t be adequately defined if we take (particularly express and deductive) inference to be the paradigm case by way of which to consider it: one instance can be the method (e.g., habituation) via which our conception of one thing will get acquired or expanded. I don’t suppose each facet of such a course of could be captured by way of inference. Purpose’s function appears important in buying and increasing ideas in addition to in reasoning from ideas constituted by them. (2) The place for past-directed actions in our understanding of sensible rationality: If we consider sensible cause primarily as a deliberative capability in advantage of which to determine what to do, it’s form of pure to lose sight of the way wherein we have interaction with the previous as a rational agent whose existence is temporally prolonged. However I feel easy issues that there are certainly issues that we are able to do concerning the previous and that the evaluation of motion is inconceivable irrespective of a wider temporal context wherein it’s positioned suffice to indicate the necessity to overcome such an inclination.
What’s your favourite movie of all time? Why? To whom would you advocate them?
Poetry, directed by Chang-Dong Lee. It’s a movie that so strongly resonates with me that I even ended up making an audacious try to debate it in my time period paper for a seminar on Kant’s third critique. I imagine it addresses so many philosophically fascinating subjects in a very illuminating approach: the function of aesthetic expertise in moral life, the connection between love and understanding, and the form of happiness that doesn’t compete with morality however relatively requires it as its constitutive half, to call just a few. It’s merely a very lovely (however unhappy) movie that I might advocate to anybody who appreciates the form of movies that make you suppose.
Which books have modified your life? In what methods?
Bertrand Russell’s The Issues of Philosophy, Jean-Paul Sartre’s Nausea, and Albert Camus’s The Fable of Sisyphus. These are the books that I occurred to run into in my senior yr at highschool due to a pal who needed to indicate off his mental profundity. After all, I understood nearly nothing about what was mentioned in them, to not point out that I wasn’t conscious of the fascinating mixture of the analytic and the continental custom (such mixture has been recurring all through my philosophical journey ever since then, for higher or worse). Nonetheless, they deeply intrigued me (it was way more fascinating than the painful drill for the Korean SAT that bugged, and remains to be bugging, most Korean highschool seniors, no less than), and made me determine to main in philosophy in school. In that sense, their affect on my life is certainly nice.
When did you final sing to your self, or to another person?
At present! My automotive is my very own personal karaoke.
What time of day are you best and inventive?
Productive: at night time, when my daughters are asleep. Artistic: when doing the dishes.
Which tremendous energy would you prefer to have?
The flexibility to learn and write tremendous quick. Or alternatively, the flexibility to endure with out sleeping very a lot. (Sure, I’m a pupil and a guardian…)
This part of the APA Weblog is designed to get to know our fellow philosophers slightly higher. We’re together with profiles of APA members that highlight what captures their curiosity not solely contained in the workplace, but additionally exterior of it. We’d love so that you can be part of it, so please contact us through the interview nomination form here to appoint your self or a pal.
