Ask Nicole: Should Research Come Before Evaluation?

0
62


Have a query you’d wish to be featured? Let me know.


This query comes from Larissa, a graduate scholar in Arizona. Larissa write:

Hello Nicole,

I’m a graduate scholar presently taking a category about analysis and analysis. I additionally simply completed a course in evaluations inside training and coaching.

My first project is to tell apart between analysis and analysis and I need to say that your publish [“Ask Nicole: What’s the Difference Between Research and Evaluation?”] has given me the clearest examples of the distinction. Thanks for that!

My query to you is are you able to please elaborate on when circumstances are extra acceptable for analysis than analysis? Having extra of an analysis background now, I are inclined to lean in direction of analysis first. Is it simply that analysis needs to be performed earlier than analysis?

I’d love to listen to your ideas!

In “Ask Nicole: What’s the Difference Between Research and Evaluation?“, I defined that how analysis and analysis are each knowledge assortment and evaluation instruments. Whereas analysis focuses on gaining or contributing new data on a subject primarily based on earlier theories, analysis is used to know the effectiveness of a program for decision-making.

To reply Larissa’s query of whether or not analysis needs to be performed earlier than an analysis, the reply is: It relies on the context (which is a really evaluator response.)

If you happen to’re like Larissa, it’s comprehensible to lean in direction of analysis earlier than analysis. Nevertheless, to find out which one to begin with, ask your self how a lot are you aware concerning the matter and make clear in case your meant aim is to construct on current data OR if the aim is to know effectiveness that contributes to decision-making.

If you happen to don’t have sufficient data, I like to recommend beginning with analysis. For instance, for some analysis tasks, I begin by conducting a literature overview to assemble data on a program matter earlier than creating an analysis technique. That is vital if I’m not properly versed within the matter and/or if I wished to find out a greatest apply for evaluating a program primarily based on the subject. On this case, analysis was useful in figuring out methods to transfer ahead with an analysis.

From a program design perspective, organizations might use analysis knowledge to know present wants earlier than designing a program (which consists of actions, outreach, size of program, subjects to cowl, and this system implementation technique.)

From an analysis perspective, an evaluator might use analysis knowledge to find out present greatest practices for program analysis primarily based on the subject, together with methods to design the analysis instruments.

From a funding perspective, organizations might use analysis knowledge as justification for a funding request for a brand new program they just lately created.

To provide a definitive reply to Larrisa’s query, to find out whether or not analysis is required earlier than an analysis, you must 1) get clear on why the information is getting used and a couple of) decide if in case you have sufficient data to maneuver ahead. If you happen to don’t have sufficient knowledge, then analysis needs to be thought-about first.


Increase your Voice: How do you identify if analysis is required earlier than an analysis? Share your ideas under within the feedback part.


Was this convenient? Click here to subscribe to the Increase Your Voice e-newsletter. 

Click here to be taught extra about my companies and uncover how we will work collectively.



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here