Chronicling the historical past of science at a latest occasion, the eminent primatologist Frans de Wall lamented the long-burning harm Skinner and the behaviorists of the mid-twentieth century did to our understanding of non-human minds and lives — the best way their views stalled science and thwarted empathy. I requested him which of our present paradigms about different animals we’ll look again upon in one other century with the identical shamed shudder with which we now look again upon the behaviorists. With out hesitation, he flagged manufacturing facility farming and the large-scale consumption of animal meat.
A century and a half earlier than us, the Victorian visionary Samuel Butler (December 4, 1835–June 18, 1902) bent his gaze previous the horizon of his tradition’s paradigms, giving impassioned voice to this sentiment and contouring a unique ethical future for our species in his prophetic 1872 novel Erewhon (public library | public domain).
Butler — an Ursula Ok. Le Guin for his time, who presaged with astonishing foresight our artificial intelligence predicament — invitations us to think about the arc of ethical progress and altering mores because the daybreak of our species, tracing that arc ahead towards our widening circles of compassion. He writes:
As soon as upon a time your fore-fathers made no scruple about not solely killing, but additionally consuming their relations. Nobody would now return to such detestable practices, for it’s infamous that we now have lived way more fortunately since they had been deserted. From this elevated prosperity we could confidently deduce the maxim that we must always not kill and eat our fellow-creatures.
An epoch earlier than Jane Goodall radicalized the examine of animals by illuminating the presence of upper consciousness in nonhuman primates, earlier than octopus intelligence stopped us in our tracks, earlier than we knew that whales keep in mind and elephants grieve, Butler provides:
It can’t be denied that sheep, cattle, deer, birds, and fishes are our fellow-creatures. They differ from us in some respects, however these by which they differ are few and secondary, whereas those who they’ve in frequent with us are many and important.
[…]
If it was fallacious of you to kill and eat your fellow-men, it’s fallacious additionally to kill and eat fish, flesh, and fowl. Birds, beasts, and fishes, have as full a proper to reside so long as they’ll unmolested by man, as man has to reside unmolested by his neighbours.
Complement with Shelley’s prescient case for animal rights and the spiritual value of vegetarianism, then revisit naturalist Sy Montgomery on how to be a good creature.
