Moral Disengagement in Social Work

0
53


Lately, social staff have paid elevated
consideration to moral points. The career’s literature has burgeoned on
subjects corresponding to moral dilemmas in social work apply, moral resolution
making, boundary points and twin relationships, ethics-related threat administration,
and ethical damage. This noteworthy development builds on social work’s wealthy and
long-standing dedication to the event of core values and moral
requirements evident all through its historical past.

But, in contrast to allied human service and behavioral well being
professions, social work’s ethics-related literature has not targeted on the
critically essential situation of ethical disengagement. Ethical disengagement is
sometimes outlined as the method whereby people persuade themselves that
moral requirements don’t apply to them.

Ethical disengagement develops within the type of six principal
phenomena:

•         ethical
justification;

•         euphemistic labeling;

•         advantageous
comparability;

•         displacing or
diffusing duty;

•         disregarding
or misrepresenting injurious penalties; and

•         dehumanizing
the sufferer.

In social work, ethical disengagement can result in ethics
violations and practitioner legal responsibility, notably when social staff imagine
that they don’t seem to be beholden to broadly embraced moral requirements within the
career.

An article in a recent issue of the
journal Social
Work
explores the character of ethical disengagement in social work,
determine potential causes and penalties, and current significant methods
designed to forestall and reply to ethical disengagement within the career.

The creator writes, “t is crucial that social staff
perceive the character and causes of ethical disengagement. Ethical disengagement
could be addressed by significant efforts on social staff’ half to interact in
self-care, burnout and impairment prevention, organizational reform, and coverage
advocacy.”

He recommends that state licensing boards, NASW’s Ethics
Committee, and social work applications at faculties and universities make ethical
disengagement a precedence.

Writer:

Frederic G. Reamer, PhD, professor, Faculty of Social Work, Rhode Island Faculty

NOTE on NASW journals: NASW journals are co-published
by NASW Press and Oxford College Press. The journal Social Work is
a good thing about NASW membership. It’s accessible on-line or, at a member’s request,
in print. Youngsters & CollegesWell being & Social Work and Social
Work Analysis
 can be found by subscription at a reduced fee for
NASW members, both on-line or in print. You could find out extra concerning the
journals and subscriptions at this link.

NASW members may also entry journal articles by means of the
Analysis Library, which could be discovered at this link.

Members who’ve questions on log-in info can
contact Member Providers at 800-742-4089, Monday-Friday 9:00 a.m. – 9:00 p.m.
ET, or at membership@socialworkers.org.



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here