A reader has alerted me to the brand new memoir of Daniel Dennett, one of many world’s most outstanding residing philosophers. I’ve learn fairly a little bit of Dennett over time and have written about just a few of his ideas. However a disclaimer. I’ve solely learn transient excerpts of the memoir as far as I await a library copy. Nonetheless, the prologue resonated deeply with me.
It recounts how he barely survived a “dissection of the aorta.” Reflecting on the expertise helped him see with nice readability the various people who collectively saved his life—surgeons, anesthesiologists, neurologists, bodily therapists, nurses, phlebotomists, x-ray technicians, in addition to all of the necessary individuals who cooked and delivered the meals, cleaned the rooms, did the laundry, pushed his wheelchair, and on and on.
Nonetheless, Dennett doesn’t worship fashionable medication, it deserves continuous scrutiny, however he is aware of his life was saved by reasoning and empirical science and its technological functions. Each motion is checked and rechecked systematically; appeals to religion are by no means tolerated. This contrasts sharply with the non secular method emphasizing heartfelt intentions that are completely ineffective in such conditions. Dennett owes his life to motive and open inquiry.
As for many who say they prayed for him Dennett tries to translate their issues into “they’re wishing me the very best.” Nonetheless, he has to withstand replying “did you additionally sacrifice a goat?” And whereas this will likely appear to be a harsh reply, there are a variety of causes to suppose it acceptable. For one factor, his properly needs may have really executed one thing helpful both for him or for another person. For an additional, overwhelming proof exhibits that intercessory prayer doesn’t work. Furthermore, you’ll be dissatisfied when a drug firm whose drug harmed you instructed you that, whereas that they had no proof of the drug’s efficacy, that they had prayed exhausting that it could work? I don’t suppose so and neither does Dennett. He’s grateful for the excessive requirements of rational inquiry to which the medical world holds itself.
Observe that that is simply the subject material of the primary pages of the prologue; I don’t know what’s to return. However be ready to come across Dennett’s fearless mind for those who learn the e book. I’ll attempt to write extra later when I’ve the possibility to learn it in full.
Favored it? Take a second to help Dr John Messerly on Patreon!
