Over 20 jobs have been marketed this season at PhilJobs: Jobs for Philosophers that record among the many desired areas of specialization or competence philosophy associated to synthetic intelligence (AI).
[image made using DALL-E]
There are questions on AI related to many subfields of philosophy—ethics, philosophy of science, philosophy of know-how, philosophy of thoughts, philosophy of artwork, and many others. The subject is a scorching one within the broader tradition owing to the event and popularization of enormous language fashions (LLMs) like ChatGPT and different machine-learning-based services and products. Directors need departments to experience the topicality of the topic in pursuit of enrollments and analysis {dollars}. And personal business and authorities businesses are growing their funding for AI-related analysis.
So it’s no shock that we’d see a rise within the variety of philosophy positions to be stuffed which have one thing to do with AI. However are there sufficient individuals specializing on this space to take up these positions?
Moreover, it looks like increasingly is being written on questions regarding philosophy and AI throughout a variety of subfields. So we would ask: are there at present sufficient specialists in these areas for the analysis being produced to be adequately vetted and peer-reviewed?
These questions had been prompted by a reader who, in an electronic mail, expressed curiosity as as to if, and if that’s the case when and for what areas, demand for philosophical experience has outstripped provide.
He writes:
I’m questioning whether or not the obvious AI hiring craze in philosophy over the previous couple of years has any priority within the self-discipline. It looks like only a few individuals have written dissertations on AI and but there have seemingly been extra jobs marketed over the previous couple of years for people working in AI than most different sub-areas. Are individuals with not-very-extensive coaching in AI ending up in these positions? That appears extremely uncommon. Relatedly, a buddy of mine with no (direct and even oblique) expertise in AI is getting requests from prime journals to assessment AI submissions. Is figure in AI actually being reviewed by non-experts? That additionally appears extremely uncommon. Has something like this occurred during the last 70+ years in educational philosophy? What ought to we as a self-discipline take into consideration the present scenario both manner?
One solution to method the precedent query can be to look by some information (see, for instance, this post on areas of specialization from final yr’s job market). One other is likely to be to recall which areas of specialization it has been particularly tough to rent in (and when).
Dialogue—on each the demand for AI and philosophy specialists and the query of precedents—is welcome.
