“We want one other and a wiser and maybe a extra mystical idea of animals,” the good nature author Henry Beston wrote in his pretty century-old meditation on otherness and the web of life. “In a world older and extra full than ours they transfer completed and full, gifted with extensions of the senses we’ve got misplaced or by no means attained, residing by voices we will by no means hear.”
Within the century since, we’ve got come to unravel a number of the wonders of the non-human sensorium — from the tetrachromatic vision of bees to the choral communication of migrating birds to the magnificent eye of the scallop. However few animal sensoria are extra marvelously apart from the flexibility of owls to see with sound, partway between synesthesia and superior mathematical computation.
The visible system of owls is already astonishing sufficient, 100 instances extra light-sensitive than that of a pigeon and able to seeing ultraviolet mild. Their monumental tubular eyes admit extra daylight and have extra cells to course of photons than the eyes of birds with a lot sharper daytime imaginative and prescient. Whereas the retinae of most birds are dominated by cones — photoreceptors tuned to brilliant mild and tasked with coloration detection — the retinae of owls comprise greater than 90% rods, tuned to low mild and delicate to motion: the weather of looking at night time.
And but probably the most extraordinary facet of owl imaginative and prescient takes place not of their eyes however of their ears — theirs is without doubt one of the most delicate auditory techniques in nature, linked to probably the most computationally spectacular brains.
In 1978, neurobiologists Eric Knudsen and Masakazu Konishi got down to illuminate its mysteries. Enlisting the assistance of an engineer who had labored on NASA’s Viking spacecraft — humanity’s historic reach for Mars — they despatched a loudspeaker circling the pinnacle of an owl alongside a light-rail, touring at a relentless distance from the owl’s head: half halo and half ring of Saturn. Observing the neural response, they found one thing by no means earlier than seen in nature — explicit auditory neurons within the owl’s mind had been responding solely when a sound was coming from a specific path: geolocation not by satellite tv for pc however by sound, doing overground what cetaceans do underwater.
Recounting the analysis in her altogether fascinating e-book What an Owl Knows: The New Science of the World’s Most Enigmatic Birds (public library), Jennifer Ackerman writes:
By evaluating the responses to sound by neurons within the cochlea of each ears, the mind builds a form of multidimensional map of auditory area. This permits owls to repair the situation of prey with velocity and precision.
[…]
Animals have mind maps for imaginative and prescient and contact, however these are constructed from visible pictures and contact receptors that map onto the mind via direct point-to-point projections. With ears, it’s solely completely different. The mind compares data acquired from every ear in regards to the timing and depth of a sound after which interprets the variations right into a unified notion of a single sound issuing from a particular area of area. The ensuing auditory map permits owls to “see” the world in two dimensions with their ears.
This analysis laid the inspiration of learning how all animal brains appraise their surroundings via sound, resulting in the event of a brand new diagnostic check for listening to loss in human infants — one thing notoriously troublesome to check in nonverbal creatures. However the owl mind itself remained a frontier of fascination.
As different neuroscientists picked up the thread, they found {that a} barn owl’s mind performs advanced mathematical computations to perform this spatial specificity, not merely including and multiplying alerts however partaking in a form of probabilistic statistical calculation often called Bayesian inference. (If there may be something to settle the controversy about whether or not people have found or invented arithmetic, right here is blazing proof that this can be a elementary language of nature in fixed dialogue with residing techniques.)
Additional analysis into the mind anatomy of owls revealed one thing much more astonishing: a part of their listening to nerve branches off into the optical middle of the mind, in order that auditory enter is processed by the visible system — actually a approach of seeing with sound.
Couple the science of the owl with its poetry in Mary Oliver’s pretty meditation on the owl as a lens on the interconnectedness of life, then revisit the poetic science of how vision shaped consciousness.
