As tales of philosophy journal horror stories proceed to come back in, one commenter made a suggestion.
[This post was originally published on March 3, 2021. It has been reposted by request of a reader.]
[Jim Picôt, “Love Heart of Nature” (photo of shark swimming in a heart-shaped school of salmon)]
If a part of the explanation for sharing such tales was to presumably reveal some widespread issues or patterns with an necessary a part of the world of educational philosophy, then, says Kaila Draper, “Possibly we should always have a thread about actually good experiences with referees and journals in order that extra patterns might be detected.”
Good thought!
Readers, when you’ve had a pleasant, useful, super-efficient, caring, understanding, and even simply notably good expertise with a philosophy journal, please share it.
And simply to get it out of the way in which, whereas we’re very pleased for you, “They accepted my article!” doesn’t qualify.
