“I’m suffering from the ricochet marvel of all of it,” poet Diane Ackerman wrote in her chic Cosmic Pastoral, “the plain everythingness of every part, in cahoots with the everythingness of every part else.”
This continues to strike me as a fantastic solution to undergo life — maybe the best: wonder-smitten by actuality, in all its dazzling interleavings.
It strikes me, too, because the deepest fundament of creativity — this willingness to search for and have a look at, actually have a look at, the totality of being and to see, as Whitman did, that every of us, each ephemeral residing factor, is a “kosmos” containing all “races, eras, dates, generations, the past, the future, dwelling there, like space, inseparable together”; to see this and, as Virginia Woolf did in that rapturous moment when she realized what it means to be an artist, “have a shock”; to make of that shock one thing that shimmers with the marvel of existence — that transcendent one thing we name artwork.
That’s what poet Mark Doty explores in his wondrous guide What Is the Grass: Walt Whitman in My Life — half biography of a uncommon artist of one other time and forever, half memoir by a uncommon artist of our personal time, half timeless meditation on the character of creativity because the work of connection and consecration.
All artists know that open nation the place creativity lives, the place the place the ego dissolves and the boundary blurs between where we end and the rest of the world beings — what Willa Cather captured because the expertise of being “dissolved into something complete and great” and what Doty calls “experiences of boundlessness.” He writes:
Such experiences seem in or flicker across the edges of each life; we’re mysterious to ourselves, and sometimes sense that there are depths we will’t simply sound, or that the origins or future of the human reside someplace in a silence we stock inside us.
[…]
It’s the identical factor poetry does, opening throughout the abnormal an area the place time swimming pools or stills, and one thing blazes up out of the acquainted.
A century after William James noticed that “our normal waking consciousness… is but one special type of consciousness, whilst all about it, parted from it by the filmiest of screens, there lie potential forms of consciousness entirely different,” Doty provides:
Visions aren’t as removed from abnormal life as we typically assume, and artists have to dwell as if revelation is rarely completed.
That dwelling-place of unfinished revelation is each the place we discover poetry and the place poetry leaves us:
Poetic creativeness isn’t often directed by the desire. Another a part of the self appears to go ahead by itself as — starting in picture or metaphor or music, a phrase that floats up and sticks within the thoughts — a poem begins.
[…]
Poetry exists to search out phrases for what resists simple naming; we’re most frequently pushed to put in writing it or learn it when every other kind of language appears incapable of the work required.
However the work shouldn’t be work within the abnormal sense, not the sort James Baldwin heralded because the artist’s duty to their expertise when he noticed that “beyond talent lie all the usual words: discipline, love, luck, but most of all, endurance.” (Probably the most that artists of genius can ever supply these of expertise is their recommendation, for they’ll by no means supply their genius, true as it’s to its Latin roots within the innate and irreplicable spirit of a being.) With a watch to the distinction between expertise and genius, Doty writes:
Work accounts for a poem of genius about as a lot as plumbing accounts for the fountains of Rome; it yields a obligatory foundation, the sensible scaffolding that underlies the entire, however can’t in itself engender a way of transport.
What accounts for a poem — or for any murals that reaches from one human consciousness to the touch and remodel one other — is the willingness to remain in that liminal house past house, time, and ego, and see what grows there when all of the stagnant certitudes we name a self fall away. Doty writes:
The world enters us and departs, simply as language and picture and thought are imprinted upon our consciousness, thought-about, forgotten, handed on, launched. I make this guide out of pondering, feeling, expertise, gentle on my laptop display; as I write the sunshine from the display enters my physique by way of my eyes, the impulses of my mind transfer my fingers to push in opposition to these keys (just a little too firmly, I’m informed, from my years of engaged on typewriters). There is no such thing as a place on the earth the place that which is “I” firmly, clearly ends, no line of demarcation. The physique of a jellyfish is someplace between 94 and 98 p.c water, which implies that a physique of water is transferring within the water. A jellyfish lacks a lot in the best way of separation from its milieu, and would possibly moderately be mentioned to be one thing extra like a course of the water is performing, an exercise happening in water, than a separate being.
Drawing on the work of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin — who too contained multitudes as a Darwinian Jesuit priest, paleontologist, and physicist reckoning with the identical permeable boundary between data and thriller that Whitman channeled in his poetry — Doty provides:
We’re all co-extensive, and our work is to maneuver towards union; evolution, Teilhard posits, is a collective movement towards better consciousness. “No evolutionary future,” he writes in The Phenomenon of Man, “awaits anybody besides in affiliation with everybody else.” We should know our fellows to ensure that every part to maneuver ahead; it’s our non secular crucial to attach, or else the future of the world can’t be accomplished.
This elemental fact is what Emily Dickinson contoured in her proto-ecological poem about the coextensive wonder of a single flower and what prompted the Nobel-winning quantum pioneer Erwin Schrödinger to make his seemingly cryptic however exquisitely reasoned assertion that, in the entire of the universe, “the over-all variety of minds is only one.”
Complement this fragment of Doty’s altogether transcendent What Is the Grass — through which he additionally explores the paradox of love and death with ravishing soulfulness — with poet, potter, and Black Mountain Faculty icon M.C. Richards on what it really means to be an artist, poet Naomi Shihab Nye on the two driving forces of creativity, and Nick Cave on its combinatorial nature, after which revisit Whitman’s personal poetic wisdom on creativity.
