The Marc Sanders Foundation has introduced the winners of its 2022 Early Fashionable Philosophy Prize and its 2022 Philosophy of Thoughts Prize.
The Early Fashionable Philosophy Prize was awarded to Gabriel Watts, a graduate scholar on the College of Sydney, for his “Hume’s Gambit: Irreligion, Animals, and Truth”. Right here’s the summary of the paper:
On this paper I develop an irreligious studying of Hume’s choice to return to philosophy after his sceptical disaster on the finish of Guide Certainly one of A Treatise of Human Nature. Any irreligious studying of Hume’s epistemology should articulate Hume’s epistemic grounds for preferring his experimental science of human nature to classy superstitious anthropologies. I argue that Hume believes his use of animal analogies to substantiate his hypotheses provides him the very best “safety” towards positing false causal claims concerning the nature of our “psychological operations”, and that the superior safety of this experimental technique of reasoning supplies him with epistemic grounds for preferring his science of human nature to superstitious metaphysics, though each have title to our assent. I conclude by suggesting that in persevering with to philosophise after his sceptical disaster, Hume dangers his mental popularity on a wager that “the most recent posterity” will discover his science of human nature a surer path to helpful truths than superstition, as a result of his experimental philosophy of human nature is probably the most epistemically safe type of anthropology there may be. This irreligious gambit, I declare, is the origin of Hume’s philosophy.
The prize is $5,000 and publication of the successful essay in Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy. You’ll be able to see an inventory of previous winners of the prize here.
Gabriel Watts, David Builes, and Michele Odisseas Impagnatiello
The Philosophy of Thoughts Prize was awarded to David Builes, an assistant professor of philosophy at Princeton College, and Michele Odisseas Impagnatiello, a graduate scholar on the Massachusetts Institute of Know-how, for his or her “Experience and Time: A Metaphysical Approach”. Right here’s the summary:
What’s the temporal construction of acutely aware expertise? Whereas it’s common to assume that our most simple acutely aware experiences are temporally prolonged, we will likely be arguing towards this view, on the grounds that it makes our acutely aware experiences depend upon the longer term in an implausible approach. We then defend another view of the temporal construction of expertise from a wide range of completely different objections. Alongside the best way, we hope as an instance the broader philosophical ramifications of the connection between expertise and time. What one thinks concerning the temporal construction of expertise is, we imagine, deeply interconnected with points regarding whether or not consciousness is obscure or exact, whether or not acutely aware states will be diminished to bodily states, whether or not phenomenal properties are intrinsic properties, and whether or not phenomenal consciousness can “overflow” entry consciousness. As we are going to see, even seemingly unrelated metaphysical questions, similar to the talk between Humean and Non-Humean accounts of pure necessity, bear on questions concerning the relationship between expertise and time.
Builes and Impagnatiello previously won the 2022 Sanders Prize in Metaphysics.
The Philosophy of Thoughts prize is $5,000 and publication of the successful essay in Analytic Philosophy. You’ll be able to see an inventory of previous winners of the prize here.
