What philosophical writing about love would you’ve got us learn?
The above is a passage from “The Historicity of Psychological Attitudes: Love Is Not Love Which Alters Not When It Alteration Finds” by Amélie Oksenberg Rorty, which appeared in Midwest Research in Philosophy in 1986. It explores the methods during which love and alter are associated, and the way an appreciation of that makes a loving relationship obscure absent an consciousness of the actual historical past of the modifications it has wrought on these in it. The essay seems to be at an imaginary couple, Louis and Ella, and at its finish, Rorty writes:
Completely happy Valentine’s Day, philosofriends. When you’re up for it, within the feedback, counsel a philosophical work on love you’d advocate we take a look at.
