Ovia Health, a digital well being platform for household care, is increasing its platform to incorporate menopause-focused choices.
Customers will be capable to monitor signs and entry academic content material, remedy choices and recommendations on speaking with physicians. Its enterprise prospects can have further entry to on-demand well being teaching, together with psychosocial help.
The corporate already provides customers and enterprise prospects the power to trace menstrual cycles, achieve insights into fertility, monitor a child’s improvement and entry well being assets on girls’s well being and household well being.
Moreover, the Labcorp subsidiary has pathways for LGBTQ+ parenting, social determinants of well being, behavioral well being and return to work.
“By increasing a platform utilized by a whole lot of 1000’s of girls, we’re bringing this much-needed dialog to the forefront in a approach that gives girls entry to info and assets throughout a pivotally necessary time. Ladies might be extra empowered to have conversations with their healthcare suppliers in a approach that helps them higher perceive and assess their healthcare wants,” Dr. Leslie Saltzman, chief medical officer of Ovia Well being, mentioned in an announcement.
THE LARGER TREND
Diagnostics and drug improvement behemoth Labcorp acquired Ovia, previously Ovuline, in 2021.
A number of different corporations have entered the digital menopause care area, together with telehealth startup Evernow, digital menopause care firm Upliv and women-focused well being administration firm Unified Women’s Healthcare.
The worldwide femtech sector is rising, and it is expected to reach $1.15 billion by 2025, in keeping with a 2021 Frost & Sullivan study.
Nevertheless, because the sector expands, lawmakers and experts have expressed considerations about data-sharing practices from period-tracking apps and well being tech corporations, particularly after Roe v. Wade was overturned.
In 2019, Ovia got here underneath fireplace for its data-sharing practices after The Washington Post reported the app shared private worker information with employers who paid to acquire the knowledge, although the knowledge was famous to be de-identified and aggregated, and staff should opt-in for information sharing.
