To be human is to be divided but indivisible — a totality of personhood continuously sundered by conflicting impulses and needs, violently pulling us in reverse instructions, paralyzing us with the lack to maneuver forward towards happiness and wholeness. “After we are in battle we are likely to make such sharp oppositions between concepts and attitudes and get caught and entangled in what appears to be a hopeless selection,” Anaïs Nin wrote in her diary as she contemplated inner conflict and the measure of maturity, “however when the neurotic ambivalence is resolved one tends to maneuver past sharp variations, sharply outlined boundaries and begins to see the interplay between all the things, the relation between all the things.”
The supreme problem of human life is that we’re way more opaque to ourselves than we wish to admit — mighty subterranean rivers of emotion and motive course beneath the reasoned floor of our aware beliefs, values, and needs. Neurosis is likely to be an old school phrase, however it’s helpful shorthand for the stress that arises from these conflicting aspects of our expertise that go away us uncertain of what we wish, what to need. For all his groundbreaking contribution to the understanding of these subterranean currents, Freud’s nice error was his pessimism concerning the mutability and therapy of our neuroses — to him, the playing cards had been dealt in early childhood and the sport of life performed out deterministically. His tragedy was his lack of religion in human progress and human goodness — Freud was the supreme cynic of the psyche.
A counterpoint to his view of human nature and potential comes from the work of the pioneering German psychoanalyst Karen Horney (September 16, 1885–December 4, 1952), nowhere extra insightfully than in her e-book Our Inner Conflicts: A Constructive Theory of Neurosis (public library), primarily based on a collection of lectures she delivered in 1943, because the world itself was being sundered by human nature’s warring factions. What emerges is a radical effort to allay neurotic hopelessness and contour the path to wholeness, ruled by Horney’s conviction that we’ve got each the desire and the capability to develop our potential for happiness and goodness, and that reasonably than residing as victims of some deterministic pathology, we go on altering for so long as we reside.
Horney defines neurosis as “a protecting edifice constructed across the primary battle.” Involved with “what unresolved conflicts do to individuals, how they produce states of tension, despair, indecision, inertia, detachment, and so forth,” involved concerning the immense emotional power and intelligence we exert on attempting to resolve our internal conflicts — “or, extra exactly, to disclaim their existence and create a man-made concord” — she writes:
Neurotic conflicts can’t be resolved by rational choice. The neurotic’s makes an attempt at answer aren’t solely futile however dangerous. However these conflicts might be resolved by altering the situations inside the persona that introduced them into being.
[…]
It’s not neurotic to have conflicts. At one time or one other our needs, our pursuits, our convictions are sure to collide with these of others round us. And simply as such clashes between ourselves and the environment are a commonplace, so, too, conflicts inside ourselves are an integral a part of human life.
[…]
To expertise conflicts knowingly, although it could be distressing, might be a useful asset. The extra we face our personal conflicts and hunt down our personal options, the extra internal freedom and energy we’ll acquire. Solely after we are prepared to bear the brunt can we approximate the perfect of being the captain of our ship.
Horney observes that the majority of our internal drives, from the eager for affection to the longing for energy, function by an engine of compulsion fueled by conflicting needs. She writes:
Compulsive drives are particularly neurotic; they’re born of emotions of isolation, helplessness, worry and hostility, and characterize methods of dealing with the world regardless of these emotions; they purpose primarily not at satisfaction however at security; their compulsive character is as a result of anxiousness lurking behind them.
With an eye fixed to her in depth work with sufferers, she displays on the 4 main makes an attempt to resolve our internal conflicts:
The preliminary try was to eclipse a part of the battle and lift its reverse to predominance. The second was to “transfer away from” individuals. The perform of neurotic detachment now appeared in a brand new gentle. Detachment was a part of the fundamental battle — that’s, one of many authentic conflicting attitudes towards others; nevertheless it additionally represented an try at answer, since sustaining an emotional distance between the self and others set the battle out of operation. The third try was very completely different in variety. As a substitute of transferring away from others, the neurotic moved away from himself. His complete precise self turned considerably unreal to him and he created as an alternative an idealized picture of himself during which the conflicting elements had been so transfigured that they not appeared as conflicts however as numerous points of a wealthy persona… The necessity for perfection now appeared as an endeavor to measure as much as this idealized picture; the longing for admiration might be seen because the affected person’s have to have exterior affirmation that he actually was his idealized picture. And the farther the picture was faraway from actuality the extra insatiable this latter want would logically be. Of all of the makes an attempt at answer the idealized picture might be a very powerful by cause of its far-reaching impact on the entire persona. However in flip it generates a brand new internal rift, and therefore requires additional patchwork. The fourth try at answer seeks primarily to put off this rift, although it helps as properly to spirit away all different conflicts. By what I name externalization, internal processes are skilled as occurring exterior the self. If the idealized picture means taking a step away from the precise self, externalization represents a nonetheless extra radical divorce. It once more creates new conflicts, or reasonably tremendously augments the unique battle — that between the self and the surface world.
Our internal conflicts, Horney observes, are in dynamic relationship with the surface world — we’re creatures of tradition, and the tumults of our tradition invariably enlarge our internal tumults:
The sort, scope, and depth of such conflicts are largely decided by the civilization during which we reside. If the civilization is steady and custom sure, the number of selections presenting themselves are restricted and the vary of potential particular person conflicts slim. Even then they don’t seem to be missing. One loyalty might intrude with one other; private needs might stand in opposition to obligations to the group. But when the civilization is in a stage of speedy transition, the place extremely contradictory values and divergent methods of residing exist facet by facet, the alternatives the person has to make are manifold and tough.
The central bind of our internal conflicts, past their largely unconscious nature, is the lack to decide on one of many contradictory impulses over the opposite — a metastasis of our general inability to know what we want. Horney observes:
We should concentrate on what our needs are, or much more, of what our emotions are. [And yet] we have no idea what we actually really feel or need.
[…]
Even when we acknowledge a battle as such, we should be prepared and capable of resign one of many two contradictory points. However the capability for clear and aware renunciation is uncommon, as a result of our emotions and beliefs are muddled, and maybe as a result of within the final evaluation most individuals aren’t safe and pleased sufficient to resign something.
In a sentiment Joan Didion would echo in her assertion that “character — the willingness to accept responsibility for one’s own life — is the source from which self-respect springs,” Horney provides:
To decide presupposes the willingness and capability to imagine accountability for it. This would come with the chance of constructing a unsuitable choice and the willingness to bear the implications with out blaming others for them.
The most common consequence of this paralysis within the effort to resolve internal conflicts is hopelessness — the debilitating worry that as a result of the decision is tough to do, it can’t be performed. All hopelessness is a form of fear-based cynicism. So far as our capability for progress goes, it’s a harmful and self-limiting mindset — maybe probably the most pernicious tactic we’ve got for standing in our personal method. Horney writes:
Human beings can apparently endure a tremendous quantity of distress so long as there may be hope; however neurotic entanglements invariably generate a measure of hopelessness… It could be deeply buried: superficially the neurotic could also be preoccupied with imagining or planning situations that may make issues higher… The neurotic expects a world of fine from exterior adjustments, however inevitably carries himself and his neurosis into every new scenario.
Hope that rests on externals is of course extra prevalent among the many younger… As individuals get older and one hope after one other fades, they’re extra prepared to take a great have a look at themselves as a potential supply of misery.
It’s this paralytic sense of hopelessness that retains us in untenable conditions — conditions that may be bettered by some effort and initiative, the motive spring of which is hope. In its absence, we stay caught. Horney considers the foundation of this self-limitation:
Hopelessness is an final product of unresolved conflicts, with its deepest root within the despair of ever being wholehearted and undivided. A mounting scale of neurotic difficulties results in this situation. Primary is the sense of being caught in conflicts like a fowl in a web, with no obvious chance of ever extricating oneself. On prime of this come all of the makes an attempt at answer which not solely fail however more and more alienate the individual from himself. Repetitive expertise serves to accentuate the hopelessness — skills that by no means result in achievement, whether or not as a result of repeatedly energies are scattered in too many instructions or as a result of the difficulties arising in any inventive course of are sufficient to discourage the individual from additional pursuit. This may occasionally apply as properly to like affairs, marriages, friendships, that are shipwrecked one after one other. Such repeated failures are as disheartening as is the expertise of laboratory rats when, conditioned to leap right into a sure opening for meals, they bounce repeatedly solely to search out it barred.
Echoing Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl’s hard-earned conviction that “everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms — to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances,” Horney outlines the deceptively easy psychological mechanism beneath our emotions of hopelessness:
[Your] scenario is hopeless solely as long as the established order persists and is thought to be unchangeable… What makes it hopeless is your individual angle towards it. If you happen to would think about altering your claims on life there could be no have to really feel hopeless.
As we start to work on resolving our internal conflicts, we get “a style of the way it feels to be free” — which is the last word purpose of remedy. Horney writes:
The conflicts might be resolved solely by altering these situations inside the persona that introduced them into being. This can be a radical method, and a tough one. In view of the difficulties concerned in altering something inside ourselves, it’s fairly comprehensible that we should always scour the bottom for brief cuts.
[…]
Essentially the most complete formulation of therapeutic targets is the striving for wholeheartedness: to be with out pretense, to be emotionally honest, to have the ability to put the entire of oneself into one’s emotions, one’s work, one’s beliefs. It may be approximated solely to the extent that conflicts are resolved.
Within the the rest of Our Inner Conflicts, Horney goes on to discover the antidote to the forces of worry, hopelessness, and impoverishment of persona stemming from our inside divisiveness and the mechanism by which we develop complete. Complement these fragments from it together with her equally insightful up to date Erich Fromm on the antidote to helplessness and disorientation and Marion Milner’s fantastic century-old field guide to knowing what you really want, then revisit Horney on the key to self-realization.
